Zoonotic Pathogens Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Babesia microti, Babesia odocoilei, and Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato Detected in Ixodes scapularis Ticks Collected at an Established Population in Eastern Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tick-borne zoonotic diseases baffle clinicians and traumatize patients worldwide. We provide the first documentation of four different tick-borne zoonotic pathogens in an established population of blacklegged ticks, Ixodes scapularis, located in eastern Canada. Using real-time and nested PCR we detected 4 pathogens in I. scapularis adults as follows: Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.), 17/25 (68%); Babesia odocoilei, 10/25 (40%); Babesia microti, 2/25 (8%); and Anaplasma phagocytophilum, 3/25 (12%). In addition, we found B. burgdorferi s.l. and B. odocoilei juxtaposed in I. scapularis adults. Moreover, polymicrobial pathogens can be condensed in a single tick bite. Symptoms of human babesiosis caused by B. odocoilei are listed. Babesia odocoilei is a sequestering Babesia sp. that is recalcitrant to treat. Clinicians must be aware that this intraerythrocytic parasite is medically different to treat than the Lyme disease bacterium. Both of these tick-borne zoonotic diseases can be persistent, and often chronic. In reality, there is no such condition as “Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (PTLDS)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".