La Police et maintien de l'ordre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This double thematic issue, containing nine articles, explores the history of the police and public order in Belgium. The guest editors are Jonas Campion (University of Quebec), Margo De Koster (Ghent University), Antoine Renglet (UC Louvain), and Xavier Rousseaux (UC Louvain). In addition to a historiographical introduction by the four guest editors, the issue includes articles by Virginie Coumans, Luc Keunings, Christophe Loir, and Thomas Schlesser on the Dictionnaire de police municipale by Chief Commissioner P.-J.-F. Van Bersel (French); an article by Jonas Maas and Pieter Leloup on the regulation of prostitution in Brussels (Dutch); by Torsten Feys on the Belgian foreigners’ police (Dutch); by Maïté Van Vyve on the 1894 attack in Liège carried out by anarchists (Dutch); by Antoine Renglet on the purges of police commissioners after the Second World War (French); by Michaël Amara and Arnaud Charon on information management within the Gendarmerie (French); by Jonas Campion and Élie Teicher on the interplay between police and film (French); by Vincent Mazy and Xavier Rousseaux on the territorial deployment of Belgian gendarmerie barracks (French). The issue also contains new book reviews.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".