MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Dual-Branch Unsupervised Network with Wavelet Transform and Style Consistency for CT to MRI Image Generation <sup>*</sup>

2025· article· W7125910072 on OpenAlexaff
Shuyue Zhang, Chaoli Wang, Zhanquan Sun, Xiaochen Feng, Yong Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPattern recognition (psychology)Consistency (knowledge bases)Wavelet transformWaveletImage (mathematics)Representation (politics)Feature extractionTranslation (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Medical image generation plays an important role in clinical applications, particularly in modality translation tasks such as CT-to-MRI synthesis. Compared with supervised methods that rely on paired datasets, unsupervised image generation is more practical due to its lower data requirements. However, existing unsupervised methods often suffer from insufficient high-frequency detail preservation and poor style consistency. Although wavelet transform offers promising multi-scale representation capabilities, effectively integrating it into deep generative models remains challenging. To address these issues, we propose WDS-Net (Wavelet-based Dual-branch Style-consistent Network). In the content encoder, wavelet decomposition is used to separate the image into low-frequency structural and high-frequency detail components, which are processed through a dual-branch architecture and then fused to enhance content representation. A multi-scale feature extraction mechanism is employed in the style encoder, and layer-wise style injection is applied during decoding to improve style consistency. Experimental results demonstrate that WDS-Net can generate high-quality MRI images under unpaired training conditions and achieves robust performance even with limited data. Evaluations on both public and clinical datasets confirm that WDS-Net outperforms existing methods in detail preservation and style consistency, showing strong potential for real-world clinical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisFrench-language works237,207