MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7125910678 · doi:10.51329/mehdiophthal1532

Sutureless-dehydrated amniotic membrane (Omnigen®) mounted on contact lens (OmniLenz®) in the treatment of small corneal perforations secondary to exposure keratitis in ICU patients

2025· article· en· W7125910678 on OpenAlexaff
Nancy M. Lotfy, Mubarak Alrasheedi, Rola Y. Khachaba, Hamad Alshatti, Yousef Taleb Ali

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Hypothesis Discovery & Innovation in Ophthalmology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCorneal Surgery and Treatments
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorneal perforationContact lensKeratitisPerforationCorneal diseaseFungal keratitis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Exposure keratopathy is a common ocular complication in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and may progress from superficial epithelial breakdown to corneal perforation, a vision-threatening emergency requiring timely management. Conventional treatments often necessitate urgent surgery, which is challenging in critically ill individuals who are unsuitable for surgical intervention. OmniLenz®, a customized bandage contact lens pre-lined with vacuum-dried Omnigen® amniotic membrane, offers a practical, non-surgical, bedside alternative for managing small corneal perforations. This study evaluates its clinical outcomes in ICU patients with a small corneal perforation secondary to exposure keratitis. Methods: This prospective interventional case series included ICU patients with <1 mm corneal perforations secondary to exposure keratitis, recruited over a two-year interval. All patients underwent corneal scraping with culture and sensitivity testing, followed by targeted antimicrobial therapy. A dehydrated amniotic membrane (Omnigen®) was applied beneath a customized bandage contact lens (OmniLenz®) at the bedside under sterile conditions. Patients were examined daily using a portable slit-lamp and followed for one month. The primary outcome was perforation closure, defined by a negative Seidel test and anterior chamber reformation. Secondary outcomes included improvement in epithelial integrity, corneal infiltration, and ciliary injection. Results: Five ICU patients, aged 18 to 70 years, with < 1 mm corneal perforations secondary to exposure keratitis were included. All eyes demonstrated rapid tectonic recovery following Omnigen®/OmniLenz® device application. Anterior chamber reformation and a negative Seidel test were achieved by day 7 in four patients and by day 10 in one patient. Complete perforation closure occurred in all cases. Marked improvement in keratitis was observed, with full epithelial defect healing and resolution of corneal infiltrates in every patient, followed by stable grade-3 stromal scarring. No neovascularization, device-related adverse events, or treatment complications occurred during the one-month follow-up. Conclusions: Omnigen®/OmniLenz® device provides a safe, effective, and non-invasive bedside treatment for small corneal perforations secondary to exposure keratitis in critically ill ICU patients. Its use enabled consistent tectonic restoration, rapid perforation closure, and resolution of infection-associated corneal pathology without procedure-related complications. This approach offers a practical alternative to urgent surgical intervention in patients unsuitable for operative care and may serve as a valuable addition to corneal perforation management protocols. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to evaluate its safety and efficacy in larger perforations and to determine long-term outcomes, including corneal scarring and visual acuity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Hypothesis Discovery & Innovation in OphthalmologySame topicCorneal Surgery and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207