MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7125950384 · doi:10.12927/hcpap.2025.27760

Health Workforce Canada: A Source of Innovation in Health Workforce Planning

2025· article· en· W7125950384 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Deb Gordon, Glenda Yeates

Bibliographic record

VenueA Nudge Too Far? A Nudge at All? On Paying People to Be Healthy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsConference Board of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkforceWorkforce planningMandateDigital healthWorkforce developmentQuality (philosophy)Workforce managementHealth information technology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2023, federal, provincial and territorial governments created Health Workforce Canada with a mandate to transform health workforce planning. Strategic initiatives focus on convening networks, advancing data, catalyzing modelling and forecasting and sharing promising practices. Early successes feature extensive collaboration and co-creation, data dashboards to assist planners and decision makers, an early microsimulation modelling tool to enable working with imprecise data and an artificial intelligence-powered Digital Front Door to enhance access to quality health workforce information and support informed decision making. Early efforts are having a positive impact on health workforce planning, data accessibility and catalyzing innovation and transformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score0.952

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0180.008
Scholarly communication0.0120.004
Open science0.0040.010
Research integrity0.0080.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueA Nudge Too Far? A Nudge at All? On Paying People to Be Healthy→Same topicGlobal Health Workforce Issues→French-language works237,207→