Les Attitudes des Étudiants des Universités Rwandaises à l’Égard du VIH
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUME Introduction. Les attitudes par rapport au VIH-sida varient en fonction de la scolarité des personnes, de la religion, du statut socioéconomique et du fait d’avoir connu ou non une personne vivant avec le VIH. L’objectif de notre étude était de décrire les attitudes des étudiants universitaires Rwandais à l’égard du VIH. Méthodologie. Il s’agit d’une étude quantitative transversale, réalisée de Novembre à Décembre 2020 portant sur les attitudes à l’égard du VIH des étudiants issus de deux universités de la province du Nord du Rwanda : Institut d’enseignement supérieur de Ruhengeri (INES-Ruhengeri : 2 816 étudiants) et Ruli Higher Institute of Health (RHIH : 400 étudiants). Résultats. Nous avons étudié 644 participants dont l’âge moyen était de 23,5 ans pour un sex ratio de 0,4. Le test de khi carré s’est révélé significatif au seuil de signification alpha = 0,05, sauf pour la catégorie de l’acceptabilité sociale ou non des patients vivant avec le VIH (PVVIH), où aucune différence n’a été révélée (valeur p : 0,238) en rapport avec le niveau de connaissances. Par ailleurs, 70,5 % des étudiants de la catégorie des connaissances moyennes désapprouvaient l’idée de culpabiliser les PVVIH, contrairement à 60,6 % de la catégorie des très faibles connaissances qui acceptaient la culpabilisation de ces personnes. Conclusion. L’acceptabilité sociale des PVVIH est présente surtout dans la catégorie des étudiants ayant un bon niveau de connaissances sur le VIH-SIDA. ABSTRACT Introduction. Attitudes towards HIV-AIDS vary according to a person's education, religion, socio-economic status and whether or not they have known someone living with HIV. The aim of our study was to measure the attitudes of Rwandan university students towards HIV. Methodology. This was a cross-sectional quantitative study conducted from November to December 2020 on attitudes towards HIV among students at two universities in the northern province of Rwanda: Institut d'Enseignement Supérieur de Ruhengeri (INES-Ruhengeri: 2,816 students) and Ruli Higher Institute of Health (RHIH: 400 students). Results. We enrolled 644 participants with a mean age of 23.5 years and a sex ratio of 0.4. The chi-square test was significant at the significance level alpha = 0.05, except for the category of social acceptability or not of PLHIV, where no difference was revealed (p value: 0.238) in relation to the level of knowledge. In addition, 70.5% of students in the medium knowledge category disagreed with the idea of making PLHIV feel guilty, unlike 60.6% in the very low knowledge category, who accepted making PLHIV feel guilty. Conclusion. The social acceptability of PLWHA is present mainly in the category of students with a good level of knowledge about HIV/AIDS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".