Strategies to Facilitate the Use of Assisted Childbirth by Nomads in Sub-Saharan Africa: Proposals from the Field in Mali
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Nomadic populations have limited access to health services including childbirth assisted by a skilled health professional which exposes nomadic women to a significant risk of maternal mortality. Through this paper, we recommend, based on our experience in providing care as a physician and our expertise in conducting research in Mali nomadic communities, strategies that could help improve nomadic women's access to childbirth assisted by a skilled health professional. Our recommendations include: 1) Mobile phones (mHealth); 2) waiting homes; 3) community-based extensions, and 4) a system of transport for parturient women. These strategies are described as feasible, affordable, and more suited to the needs, expectations and sociocultural realities of nomadic populations. RÉSUMÉ Les populations nomades ont un accès limité aux services de santé, y compris à l'accouchement assisté par un professionnel de santé qualifié, ce qui expose les femmes nomades à un risque important de mortalité maternelle. Dans ce document, nous recommandons, sur la base de notre expérience en tant que médecin et de notre expertise en matière de recherche dans les communautés nomades du Mali, des stratégies susceptibles d'améliorer l'accès des femmes nomades à l'accouchement assisté par un professionnel de la santé qualifié. Nos recommandations sont les suivantes 1) les téléphones mobiles (mHealth) ; 2) les maisons d'attente ; 3) les extensions à base communautaire, et 4) un système de transport pour les parturientes. Ces stratégies sont décrites comme étant réalisables, abordables et mieux adaptées aux besoins, aux attentes et aux réalités socioculturelles des populations nomades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".