Family, Community, Country, and Race: The State of the Nation Plays of Roy Williams and Clint Dyer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines the complexity of dramatizing race relations in terms of class, gender, and ethnicity from a Black British perspective in four State of the Nation plays by Roy Williams and Clint Dyer. In 2002, Black dramatist Roy Williams wrote Sing Yer Heart Out for the Lads, set in a south-west London working-class pub where Williams explores a microcosm of complex attitudes and perspectives about nation and race among a mixture of races, genders, and ages. Eighteen years later, Roy Williams and the Black dramatist and director Clint Dyer wrote a trilogy of stage plays with the overall title Death of England, comprising two monodramas, Death of England (2020) and Death of England: Delroy (2020), plus a duologue, Death of England: Closing Time (2023). The trilogy is underpinned by the metaphoric use of the family drama as an illustration of the state of race and class in England. The social and cultural context for the metaphor is conveyed by the creation of a new mixed-race family living in Leyton, a traditionally working-class community in east London. Although the plays are thematically discrete, together they offer a complex and comprehensive picture of race and class in England. In this article, I argue that despite their similar approaches to the State of the Nation genre, at the close of the Death of England plays, unlike in Sing Yer Heart Out for the Lads, there is some hope articulated in the struggle for a racially egalitarian future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".