MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7126185461 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/v4rmp

Early, Late and Sequential Psychosocial Mediators of Reduction in Depression Symptoms Six Months Following Group Support Psychotherapy among People Living with HIV in Uganda: A Longitudinal Mediation Analysis

2025· dataset· en· W7126185461 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Rongjie Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueOSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGrand Challenges CanadaMQ: Transforming Mental Health
KeywordsSocial supportMediationCoping (psychology)PsychosocialCognitive reframingDepression (economics)Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Psychological intervention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Group Support Psychotherapy (GSP) is an evidence-based treatment for mild to moderate depression among people living with HIV(PLWH). However, little is known about which psychosocial processes mediate its effects on reduction in depression symptoms and how these processes emerge and evolve over time. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomised trial in Uganda, comparing GSP to Group HIV Education among PLWH with mild to moderate depression. Using generalised structural equation modelling, we assessed whether changes in psychosocial factors mediated intervention effects on reduction of depression symptoms at 2 and 6 months. Single-mediator and sequential mediation models were used to evaluate early, late, and sequential psychosocial pathways. Indirect effects were estimated using bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals. Analyses accounted for clustering at the health-center level and district stratification, with additional sensitivity analyses accounting for health workers nested within health centers. Results: In single mediator analyses, psychosocial changes occurring during therapy showed evidence of contributing to reduction in depression symptoms both at the end of treatment and six months later, although these effects were generally modest and sensitive to clustering assumptions. Improvements in active coping and decreased denial, behavioral disengagement, alcohol use and self-blame during therapy mediated symptom reduction with modest indirect effects. In contrast, post-treatment improvements in self-esteem, help-seeking, positive reframing, acceptance, and decreased stigma demonstrated larger and more robust indirect effects. Sequential mediation analyses suggest that mediation effects of emotional support seeking initiated during therapy, continued and strengthened over time, whereas mediation effects of self-esteem and stigma reduction emerged only after treatment. Conclusion: Reduction in depression symptoms following GSP appears to be a dynamic process in which early psychosocial changes initiate symptom improvement, while later psychosocial changes sustain and strengthen these effects over time. Emotional support seeking may function as an upstream process that facilitates broader psychosocial change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)→French-language works237,207→