France Martineau & Terry Nadasdi (éds), Le français en contact. Hommages à Raymond Mougeon , Québec, Les Presses Universitaires de Laval, 2011, 426 p., ISBN 978-2-7637-9317-7
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RésuméCet article porte sur la liaison dans un parler spontané familier. Partant du constat que, dans la parole familière, les prononciations s’écartent souvent de leur forme canonique du fait d’un taux de réduction temporelle élevé, nous faisons l’hypothèse que le nombre de liaisons réalisées se trouve diminué dans ce type de parole. Notre étude repose sur une exploration du corpus NCCFr (Nijmegen Corpus of Casual French) à partir de techniques automatiques comme l’alignement automatique. Les taux de réalisation sont mesurés pour les consonnes de liaison les plus fréquentes (/z/, /n/ et /t/) dans des sites de liaison potentielle classés selon que la liaison y est obligatoire, facultative ou interdite. Nous proposons également une étude sur les relations entre le débit de parole et la réalisation des liaisons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".