MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7126271280 · doi:10.71892/11143/1383

A conceptual approach for correcting global snow water equivalent data and evaluating its impact on streamflow forecast

2025· other· en· W7126271280 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charles Whittaker

Bibliographic record

VenueUSherbrooke-PROD · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowFlood forecastingData assimilationStreamflowSnowmeltProbabilistic logicWatershedFlood myth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis addresses the challenges of using satellite-derived snow water equivalent (SWE) products from passive microwave (PMW) observations in hydrological forecasts, such as flood forecasting and hydropower optimization. The study focuses on reducing the bias of GlobSnow, a global SWE product, which suffers from low spatial resolution and underestimation of deep snow due to volume scattering effects. A novel bias correction method, the Watershed Scale Correction (WSC), is introduced to adjust GlobSnow SWE based on direct runoff measurements during the spring melt season. The first part of the thesis develops and applies the WSC approach to eight watersheds in Quebec, resulting in an average bias reduction from 33.5% to 18%. The corrected SWE product is then assimilated into GR4J, a lumped conceptual hydrological model, to improve streamflow forecasts for the spring flood season. The second part explores the assimilation of both the original and corrected SWE products, as well as point data measurements, into the GR4J model through deterministic and probabilistic experiments. Deterministic experiments showed that assimilating uncorrected SWE often degraded performance, notably in smaller basins, while assimilating the corrected SWE product consistently improved forecasts and in some cases (e.g., Manic-5 and St. Francis River watersheds, 2015–2016) matched or outperformed point-based snow course data. Probabilistic experiments confirmed that the assimilation of the uncorrected SWE product degraded skill as melt advanced, whereas the corrected product reduced Normalized Root Mean Square Error NRMSE and improved Continuous Ranked Probability Skill Score CRPSS on most forecast dates, with the largest gains in high-SWE or high-bias years (e.g., 2015). Improvements were less pronounced in low-variability years for SWE (e.g., 2012) and were sometimes reduced by inconsistencies between the precipitation and temperature dataset (ERA5-Land) used for hydrological model calibration and the forecast forcing dataset (EM-Earth), which introduced systematic precipitation biases. Finally, uncertainty analysis using a range of WSC-derived correction factors highlighted that SWE-related uncertainty can be as large as, or larger than, meteorological uncertainty in some watersheds. Results showed that SWE uncertainty dominated in Manic-5 across all years, in St. Francis in most years (except 2013), while Batiscan was more strongly influenced by meteorological forcing. This research contributes to advancing SWE-based hydrological forecasting by demonstrating how watershed-scale correction of PMW-derived SWE can reduce systematic biases in satellite data and improve streamflow forecasting model performance. It also provides probabilistic bounds that explicitly account for both meteorological and snow-related uncertainties, which are critical for applications such as flood prediction and hydropower production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.679
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUSherbrooke-PRODFrench-language works237,207