MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7126669692

“I will tell you of Salieri’s cabals”: Conspiratorial Thought and the Intriguing Afterlives of Antonio Salieri

2025· article· en· W7126669692 on OpenAlexaff
Kristin Franseen

Bibliographic record

VenueIndiana Magazine of History (Indiana University) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSamuel Beckett and Modernism
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeature (linguistics)Perspective (graphical)George (robot)Subject (documents)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Antonio Salieri (1750-1825) occupies a strange place in historical, biographical, and popular understandings of late eighteenth-century European art music.Despite a lengthy and successful career as a composer of large-scale theatrical and sacred works, teacher of composition and voice, and administrator in the vast Habsburg musical bureaucracy, he is undoubtedly best known for his dubious status as Mozart's rival.Indeed, in the decades immediately following his death, Salieri quickly became a highly contested fictionalized character in the international literature, with plays, operas, and short fiction dramatizing his relationship with Mozart and arguing for or against his place in music history.Within musicology, reception histories tend to focus on changing views of particular musical works in different historical and cultural settings.How, then, can one speak of the reception of a composer more remembered for debunked gossip around murder and envy than for his actual compositions?Since the 1970s, much musicological ink has been spilled attempting reassessing Salieri's musical contributions and broader impact. 1 My paper for the Eighteenth-Century Afterlives Spring Workshop does not aim to relitigate the truth or falsehood of the many conflicting claims surrounding Salieri's career.Rather, I more closely examine how the meanings attached to Salieri's alleged "intrigues" or "cabals" have shifted over time and in subsequent fictional retellings.The allegation originated in the Mozart family letters, wherein both Mozart and his father Leopold occasionally mention plots against Mozart's operas supposedly led by the far more established Salieri. 2 In the context of the 1780s and 1790s, however, the terms clearly referred to the normal politicking and networking involved with the business of opera in Vienna, which could involve collaboration and competition across a vast array of composers, poets, singers, theater managers, censors, and other professionals. 3During the decades following Mozart's death, however, biographers and critics attempting to make sense of Mozart's life and early death increasingly saw his rivalry with Salieri in terms of an aesthetic dispute, whether between Italian-and German-language opera (as in Albert Lortzing's 1834 opera Szenen aus Mozarts Leben) or between Salieri's professional successes during his lifetime and the emergent

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.942

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndiana Magazine of History (Indiana University)Same topicSamuel Beckett and ModernismFrench-language works237,207