Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 3-month-old Labrador retriever presented to Cornell's Soft Tissue Surgery Service with a history of regurgitation that began after he was introduced to solid food. Attempts to feed the patient a frequent elevated slurry diet failed to resolve regurgitation. A barium swallow study and thoracic radio graphs supported the presumptive diagnosis of a persistent right aortic arch. On presentation to Cornell's Soft Tissue Surgery Service, the patient appeared bright and alert, and in great condition. A computed tomography angiogram and 3D reconstruction of his heart supported the diagnosis of a Type 1 persistent right aortic arch consisting of a right sided aortic arch with an aberrant right subclavian artery, bicarotid trunk, aberrant left subclavian artery, and a left sided non-patent ligamentum ateriosum. A left 4th intercostal thoracotomy was performed. The ligamentum aiteriosum was identified attached proximally to the persistent right aortic arch and distally to the left pulmonary artery. Two ligatures were placed over the ligamentum arteriosum and the ligament was transected between the ligatures to release constriction over the esophagus. The aberrant left subclavian artery was identified and found not to be associated with any esophageal entrapment. The patient recovered from anesthesia without complications and was discharged two days after surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.028 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".