Bibliographic record
Abstract
An 11 year old spayed female Labrador Retriever presented to Cornell University Ophthalmology Service for emergency evaluation of a four day history of glaucoma affecting her left eye. The patient was initially evaluated at her primary care veterinarian for squinting and increased ocular discharge from her left eye. She was diagnosed with glaucoma OS and medically managed with latanoprost and dorzolamide-timolol. Since she did not respond appropriately to treatment, the patient was referred to Cornell for further evaluation and treatment. On presentation, the patient was bright, alert and responsive. On ophthalmic exam of the left eye, notable findings included buphthalmos, corneal edema and scleral injection. Pupillary light reflex, menace response and dazzle reflex were all absent OS, demonstrating that the patient was blind in that eye. The intraocular pressure OS was elevated at 37 mmHg. Ophthalmic exam of the right eye revealed no significant findings (intraocular pressure OD was 12 mm Hg). Ocular ultrasound showed a hyperechoic mass within the globe. Chest radiographs were negative for metastatic disease. The following morning, the patient underwent an enucleation of her left eye. Afterward, she was continued on dorzolamide-timolol for her right eye. The left eye was submitted to the Comparative Ocular Pathology Laboratory of Wisconsin (COPLOW). Histopathology findings were consistent with uveal malignant melanoma and acute secondary glaucoma. At a recheck exam 4 weeks later, the patient was found to be doing well at home. Intraocular pressure in the right eye was normal and she was discontinued off eye medications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.058 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".