FEATURES OF SOCIAL COUNSELING FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES IN TIMES OF CRISIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article highlights social counseling as one of the key forms of support for persons with disabilities within the modern social work system. Counseling is considered a professional activity aimed at helping individuals overcome life difficulties, adapt to their social environment, realize their rights and opportunities, and improve their quality of life. It is emphasized that persons with disabilities require an individual approach that takes into account their specific needs related to access to education, employment, medical care, domestic adaptation, social integration, and the establishment of meaningful interpersonal relationships. The article analyzes the main areas of social counseling: psychosocial support, legal counseling, navigation in the social services system, career guidance, and counseling for parents of children with disabilities. The role of the social counselor as a guide in the world of social assistance is highlighted, as well as that of an emotional supporter who possesses active listening and crisis counseling techniques and is able to adapt communication to the client's characteristics. Special attention is paid to the classification of theoretical approaches in social counseling, such as psychosocial, cognitive-behavioral, client-centered, existential-humanistic, systemic, empowerment, and integrated approaches. A detailed description of each approach is provided, revealing their purpose, methods, areas of application, and features of working with different categories of persons with disabilities. It is emphasized that the choice of approach depends on the type of disability, the client's age, life experience, psycho-emotional state, and social context. The article also provides an analytical overview of the state of social counseling in Ukraine. It is noted that the domestic system is still in its infancy, although it has significant scientific and methodological potential. Key problems are identified: a shortage of qualified personnel, the lack of a unified methodology, fragmented legislative regulation, and limited access to services in rural areas. Domestic practice is compared with the international experience of the European Union, the United States, and Canada, where social counseling is viewed as a systematic and comprehensive activity, integrated into the social protection system and guaranteed at the level of state policy. The institutional, ethical, and practical foundations of effective counseling are also considered, in particular the principles of confidentiality, non-discrimination, respect for dignity, and personal autonomy. The importance of implementing a multidisciplinary approach, developing partnerships between state and public institutions, and expanding the role of the non-governmental sector is emphasized. The materials in this article may be useful for social workers, psychologists, educators, human rights defenders, representatives of governmental and non-governmental organizations working with persons with disabilities, as well as for students and researchers interested in the development of inclusive social policy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".