HUBUNGAN DUKUNGAN SOSIAL TEMAN SEBAYADENGAN QUARTER LIFE CRISIS PADA MAHASISWA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara Dukungan Sosial Teman Sebaya dengan Quarter Life Crisis pada mahasiswa. Hipotesis yang diajukan adalah “terdapat hubungan positif antara dukungan sosial teman sebaya dengan quarter life crisis pada mahasiswa”. Subjek penelitian adalah mahasiswa aktif Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata yang berusia 18-23 tahun dan bersedia menjadi subjek penelitian. Jumlah sampel pada penelitian ini adalah 50 mahasiswa. Analisis data pada penelitian ini menggunakan program SPSS dengan teknik korelasi Product Moment. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan nilai koefisien Pearson Correlation sebesar negatif 0,579 yang mana termasuk pada kategori tingkat hubungan yang cukup kuat dengan angka signifikansi 0,000 (<0,05) sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat hubungan negatif yang cukup kuat dan signifikan antara dukungan sosial teman sebaya dan quarter-life crisis pada mahasiswa. Semakin tinggi dukungan sosial teman sebaya maka semakin rendah tingkat quarter life crisis pada mahasiswa dan demikian pula sebaliknya. Dengan demikian hipotesis diterima. Kata Kunci: Dukungan Sosial Teman Sebaya, Mahasiswa, Quarter Life Crisis
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".