HUBUNGAN ANTARA KEPERCAYAAN DIRI DENGAN QUARTER LIFE CRISIS PADA MAHASISWA SOEGIJAPRANATA CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY SEMARANG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter life crisis adalah kondisi rasa cemas & kebimbangan terjadi tiap individu di awal masa dewasa, yakni diantara usia 18 sampai 29 tahun. Salah satu faktornya diduga berperan dalam hal tersebut yaitu kepercayaan diri individu. Riset ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi hubungan antara kepercayaan diri dengan quarter life crisis pada mahasiswa Soegijapranata Catholic University Semarang. Metode riset yang dipergunakan ialah kuantitatif korelasional melalui teknik pengambilan sampel accidental sampling. Partisipan riset ini berjumlah 143 mahasiswa yang berusia 19-22 tahun. Pengukuran data dilaksanakan mempergunakan Skala Quarter Life Crisis dan Skala Kepercayaan Diri usai diuji validitas dan reliabilitasnya. Hasil analisis data menggunakan uji korelasi Spearman’s rho dengan nilai korelasi sebesar -0,848. Maka, kesimpulannya terdapat hubungan negatif yang sangat signifikan antara quarter life crisis dengan kepercayaan diri pada mahasiswa Soegijapranata Catholic University Semarang. Artinya, semakin tinggi kepercayaan pada mahasiswa Soegijapranata Catholic University Semarang, maka semakin rendah quarter life crisis yang dialami mahasiswa, begitupun sebaliknya.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".