Bibliographic record
Abstract
" Ammoniaque is a photographic and poetic meditation around a tin wall located in the west of the Hochelaga district in Montreal. Covered with words written with markers, this wall have become a support for an equivocal writing, at time psychotic. What is there to understand, from these enigmatic inscriptions riddled with references to popular culture and an underworld, except the clear suffering of a person willing to speak out ? [...] In the case of Ammoniaque, the images, grouped under several chapters that follow the artist’s journey chronologically, generate a reflection on the erasure of the voice of the marginalized in the social debate. We discover a neighborhood where the stakes of narcoprostitution remain very present, and this, in spite of the gentrification that is evident there. The title Ammoniaque, for its part, recalls the presence of the odorous Lallemand factory, located in the western part of the neighborhood, which some citizen groups consider dangerous and potentially toxic. In a raw and direct style, the artist’s images bear witness to the muffled cries of those who choose to make themselves heard in ways other than through the official voices of social engagement. A series of typewritten poems, whose graphic style is reminiscent of the photographed inscriptions, accompany the series of images. These texts also call for a careful deciphering of the words and the meaning to be attributed to them. " -- Publisher's website
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.375 | 0.120 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".