MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7127295464 · doi:10.18280/i2m.240603

Predictive Corrosion Degradation Modelling of Oil Country Tubular Goods Using Physics-Informed Machine Learning and Digital Twin Technologies

2025· article· W7127295464 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohammed Jasim Aljumaili, Hiba A. Abdalwahhab, Hyman Jafar Meerza, Mohammed Ali Abdulrehman, Ahmed Subhi Abbas, Dar Ali Yousif

Bibliographic record

VenueInstrumentation Mesure Métrologie · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMustansiriyah UniversityUniversity of Anbar
KeywordsDegradation (telecommunications)Production (economics)Oil productionCorrosion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study provides a comprehensive research methodology to accurately determine the degradation and remaining life of Oil Country Tubular Goods (OCTG) under sour and high-temperature conditions.Experiments were conducted to determine the properties of three materials (API X70 Carbon Steel, 22Cr duplex stainless steel, and Inconel 625).The results confirmed that Inconel 625 possessed the maximum hardness and resistance to corrosion, followed by 22Cr duplex stainless steel and API X70 Carbon Steel.A physicsinformed long short-term memory (PI-LSTM) algorithm was developed for physically grounded estimation by incorporating Paris's law and Arrhenius models for corrosion.The algorithm outperformed all conventional models (accuracy-93% and R -0.92), enabled reliable life estimation in digital twin simulation platforms, and allowed precise estimation of degradation performance 10% accuracy, replicating laboratory experiments.The digital twin simulation estimated the pipeline health index values to provide reliable predictive maintenance services.The methodology provides efficient research for scaling intelligent integrity management systems for OCTG under adverse operational conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.375
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstrumentation Mesure MétrologieSame topicMachine Learning in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207