Evolution of the Structural Style of the North Atlantic Basement from the Breakup of the Continent to Modern Rifting according to the Anomalous Gravity Field
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The basement structure of the Newfoundland–Iberian segment of the Atlantic–Arctic rift system bounded by the 1st order demarcation faults, within which the demarcation boundary of the 2nd order is distinguished, fundamentally differs to the north and south of it according to the relief and gravity anomalies. The “aspect” attribute calculated from the free air gravity is a morphometric attribute that reflects as plausibly as possible the basement structures beneath the sedimentary cover near the continental margins of the segment and in the Mid-Atlantic Ridge area free of sedimentary cover. Evaluation of methods for calculating the quantitative characteristics of this attribute in test areas with the predominance of typical mutually orthogonal seafloor structural elements showed that the 2D spectra of the analyzed field in the local areas, in addition to the orientation of structures, also demonstrate their amplitude in the initial field and their spatial periodicity, and adequately describe the structural style of the basement in the present-day coordinates, varying from the basin periphery to the mid-ocean ridge. Evolution leads to the formation of basement with a variable geometry, which involves seafoor rotation by ∼10°–15° and deviations due to superimposed atypical structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".