MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7127383945 · doi:10.58066/f3pp-8m34

Interview with Paul Hook

2025· other· en· W7127383945 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
:unav

Bibliographic record

VenueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftware deploymentOfficerHookInfantryCrewTreasureMultinational corporationBridge (graph theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Narrator: Major (Ret.) Paul Hook Interviewer: Interviewed by Nick Jordan. Interview Date and Location 24 February 2025 - Zoom Synopsis: 0:37 – 5:01: Life before military service, early impressions of the military in the United States and Canada; admission to the Royal Military College and the decision to join the armored corps. 5:01- 10:09: Basic Officer Training and life at RMC. Transition to the regiment, early lessons, and beginning a family. Grew up quickly. First child one year before deploying to Afghanistan. “The one constant is change; being okay with change; it's tough not being in control of things.”; “compartmentalize”. 10:09 - 15:00: Workups, pre-deployment training, and the birth of a child six months before deployment to Afghanistan. 5 vehicles, 19 crew members. 15:01 – 21:00: Deployment to Afghanistan; first impressions of Kabul; Kabul Multinational Brigade, exposure to international forces. 21:00 – 25:10: Reflections on the reality of the war, the impact of stress; men on the bridge and the acceptance of fate; morale and unit cohesion “work hard, play hard”; the role of members with deployment experience. 25:10 – 31:56: End of deployment, final patrols in “IED Alley”, post-deployment decompression in the UAE, “forced fun:, Surprised by two of their comrades struggling with their experience decades later. “At the mercy of someone else’s good planning,” “you have to hope you’re lucky that day.” “What did we spend all that national treasure of blood on?” “…if the situation is just going to revert back.” 40:11 – 47:23: Impressions of Andre Marin’s 2002 and 2008 reports, which he knew about and read, “people didn’t talk about PTSD; people understood what it was”, “we didn’t know enough as an organization.”; “the shock was that they weren’t being acted upon”. Mental health supports. 47:23 – 55:32: Peace Support Centre and master’s degree, turning point for understanding veteran mental health 55:32 – 1:00:45: The role of commemoration; connecting earlier points about the moral injury and how that can be salved or worsened by commemoration, 1:00:45 – 1:05:11: The interdisciplinary nature of veteran support and veteran mental health research. “Bio-psycho-social”, concluding remarks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)French-language works237,207