MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7127556832

Construction of a Tissue Microarray for Validation of EphA2 Receptor as a Prostate Cancer Biomarker

2019· other· en· W7127556832 on OpenAlexaff
Adam Bromby

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Explorer (The University of Manchester) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstate cancerEPH receptor A2Tissue microarrayBiomarkerProstateCancerPCA3Cancer biomarkers
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Prostate cancer is the most common non-cutaneous male cancer, with an increasing incidence secondary to PSA use.There remains much uncertainty regarding its natural history, and thus further uncertainty surrounding treatment with subsequent under-and over-treatment.There is an association with diet, particularly diets high in 6 polyunsaturated fatty acids such as arachidonic acid.Arachidonic acid may promote the metastasis-like behaviour of epithelial to mesenchymal transition of prostate cancer cells via the EphA2 pathway.In an initial study, EphA2 expression was shown to correlate in prostate cancer specimens to overall survival suggesting use as a biomarker.The aim of this project was to construct a new tissue microarray for validation of EphA2 as a biomarker.Methods: Electronic patient records were reviewed to update the Salford Royal Prostate Cancer database.Samples were identified from the Salford Royal Prostate Cancer tissue bank.H&E slides were reviewed to identify areas of prostate cancer to be isolated for construction of a new tissue microarray.An immunofluorescence protocol using the Ventana system was optimised to assess EphA2 expression.Results: A total of 296 patients were included within the new tissue microarray.Sample size calculations showed that this is of a sufficient size to validate earlier findings regarding overall survival, metastatic disease, and biochemical progression, but not prostate cancer death.The validation cohort was comparable both with the original tissue microarray cohort in terms of age, stage, Gleason score, biochemical progression, and overall survival.Results were also comparable to national data.Discussion: EphA2 has shown potential to be a prostate cancer biomarker to predict for overall survival, metastasis, and biochemical progression.This project has resulted in the construction of a sufficiently sized new tissue microarray from patients with prostate cancer TRUS biopsies at the time of diagnosis with an extensive follow-up.This may potentially be used to validate initial findings but also act as a resource for assessment of future prostate cancer biomarkers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Explorer (The University of Manchester)French-language works237,207