Real-world outcomes and safety of low- vs. standard-dose SGLT2 inhibitors in heart failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are a cornerstone in heart failure (HF) treatment. Unlike other guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT), which require dose titration, SGLT2i were studied and approved at a fixed dose (e.g., 10 mg/day dapagliflozin or empagliflozin). However, lower doses are sometimes prescribed in real-world practice due to safety concerns, despite lacking clinical trial validation. These alternative dosing strategies have not been systematically studied, raising uncertainty about their clinical effectiveness and safety. Purpose To evaluate real-world outcomes of low-dose versus standard-dose SGLT2i in HF patients. Methods A retrospective cohort study using ICES administrative health databases was conducted. We identified HF patients aged ≥65 years in Ontario, Canada, who were newly prescribed either a low dose (5 mg daily) or standard dose (10 mg daily) of empagliflozin or dapagliflozin between June 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality or cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included CV and HF hospitalizations, mortality, and adverse drug reactions. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to adjust for confounders. Multivariable Fine-Gray proportional hazards models examined differences in outcomes between groups. Exclusion criteria included type 1 diabetes, long-term care residents, contraindications to SGLT2i, canagliflozin use and non-Ontario residency. Follow-up continued until treatment discontinuation, dose adjustment, a predefined outcome event, death or end of follow-up (December 31, 2023). Results Among 202,881 HF patients prescribed SGLT2i, 25,595 received a low dose and 177,286 a standard dose. Patients in the low-dose group tended to be older, had lower eGFR, and higher comorbidity burdens but fewer prior CV events and revascularizations. After matching, 46,218 patients remained (23,209 in each group) and baseline characteristics were well-balanced (absolute standardized differences < 0.1). The primary outcome incidence was 6.0 per 100 person-years in both groups. After multivariable adjustment, Low-dose SGLT2i was associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88–0.99, p=0.02) and CV hospitalization (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78–0.91, p<0.0001), with no significant differences in HF hospitalization (HR 0.93, p=0.33) or mortality (HR 1.04, p=0.47). The incidence of genital mycotic infections and other adverse events was similar in both groups. Conclusion Low-dose SGLT2i was associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome (all-cause mortality or CV hospitalization) and a reduced risk of CV hospitalization compared to standard doses. There was no evidence of increased risk for HF, mortality, or adverse drug reactions. These findings support the consideration of low-dose SGLT2i in selected HF patients. Further studies are needed to clarify the long-term implications of this dosing approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".