Media Framing of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB)’s Agitation for the Restoration of Biafra in Two Nigerian Newspapers (2017–2022)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The perceived marginalisation of the Igbo ethnic group of South East Nigeria and the failure of the Nigerian government to pursue peace-building initiatives 50 years after the end of the Nigerian and Biafran civil war are the root causes of the current agitation for the restoration of Biafra by the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB). Thus, the present study analysed 120 news stories from The Daily Sun and The Punch newspapers in Nigeria, from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2022, regarding their coverage of the recent agitation for the restoration of Biafra. Our research examined how these newspapers framed the renewed agitation, what agenda they set in framing the agitation, and the implications of news framing and agenda setting for the audience regarding the ways they view the agitation for the restoration of Biafra by IPOB. The findings revealed that the placement of most news stories about IPOB, Nnamdi Kanu, and other Biafran agitators on the front page of newspapers, especially The Daily Sun, was part of the media's framing and agenda for the restoration of Biafra. The positive framing of Nnamdi Kanu and other Biafran actors, especially in The Daily Sun, may have been the reason for the support the agitation is receiving from Biafrans at home and in the diaspora. In contrast, the Punch newspaper dwelt more on the negative framing of Nnamdi Kanu and other Biafran actors, thus showing resentment from Nigerians who do not want Biafrans to exit from Nigeria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".