MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Independent and cumulative prognostic information of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 to predict major adverse cardiovascular events and death in post acute coronary syndrome patients

2025· article· en· W7127686543 on OpenAlexaff
J W Jukema, N J Van Neer, MICHAEL SZAREK, C Cobbaert, V A Bittner, Markus Schwertfeger, D L Bhatt, S Fazio, S G Goodman, R A Harrington, Irena Stevanovic, H D White, P G Steg, G G Schwartz

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaceAcute coronary syndromeClinical endpointC-reactive proteinBiomarkerProportional hazards modelCause of deathPlacebo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Interleukin 6 (IL6), produced in response to infections and tissue injury, contributes to host defence through the stimulation of acute phase responses and immune reactions. The inflammatory cascade is characterized by activation of the NLRP3-inflammasome, causing IL1 to IL6 production leading to the clinical biomarker C-reactive protein (CRP) elevation. In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), both IL6 and high-sensitivity (hs) CRP levels are associated with risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). However, the independent and cumulative prognostic information provided by IL6 and hs-CRP after ACS is unclear. Methods The ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial compared the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab with placebo added to maximum-tolerated statin treatment in patients post-ACS. We assessed in patients from whom biobank samples were available the relation between log IL6 and hsCRP levels (Roche) at baseline and the risk of MACE and all-cause death in proportional hazards models. Results 11,817 patients had both baseline CRP and IL6 data; 1306 had a MACE primary endpoint and 458 died. Median hsCRP, IL6 and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) were 1.54 mg/L, 5.00 pg/mL, and 86 mg/dL, respectively. hsCRP and IL6 had moderate correlation (r=0.52). Adjusted for treatment assignment, age, sex, diabetes, LDL-cholesterol, and time since index ACS, hsCRP was a significant predictor of MACE (p<0.0001) but IL6 was not (p=0.21), while both predicted all-cause death (p<0.0001 for hsCRP and p=0.0003 for IL6). Relationships did not depend on treatment (all interaction p>0.25). Therefore, hsCRP remains significantly related to risk of MACE and death when accounting for IL6. Conclusion In patients with recent ACS, both hsCRP and IL6 predicted all-cause death in univariate and adjusted analyses. IL6 levels predicted MACE in univariate but not in adjusted analyses. In contrast, hsCRP predicted MACE in both univariate and adjusted analyses. Thus, hsCRP appears to convey substantial independent information on inflammatory risk beyond that provided by IL6. This has implications for prognosis and possibly for trials of anti-inflammatory drugs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesFrench-language works237,207