MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7127945557 · doi:10.22260/crc-csce-2025/0150

Assessing the Effectiveness of BIM in Achieving Compliance with NECB Energy Efficiency Pathways

2025· article· W7127945557 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zahra Naghshzan, Erik A. Poirier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEfficient energy useCompliance (psychology)Energy (signal processing)Production (economics)Key (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Building Information Modeling (BIM) has become a foundational technology in the construction sector, revolutionizing collaboration and lifecycle information management and leading to building design and management efficiency.When applying BIM to energy efficiency, meeting the requirements of the National Energy Code of Canada for Buildings (NECB) poses unique challenges due to its distinct compliance pathways: prescriptive, trade-off, and performance based.Each pathway demands different design precision and analysis levels, often resulting in complexities and inefficiencies.This study investigates BIM's potential to streamline NECB compliance, focusing on improving efficiency, precision, and effectiveness in achieving energy performance standards.The research aims to evaluate how BIM can support automation, facilitate decision-making, and streamline the integration of energy compliance requirements.The research methodology includes an extensive literature review, and a comparative analysis of BIM workflows and tools tailored to the NECB pathways.Key performance indicators such as energy optimization, compliance timelines, and error minimization are assessed to understand BIM's value in this context.The findings suggest that BIM can potentially improve compliance verification, especially within the prescriptive and trade-off pathways, by minimizing manual work and enabling efficient energy simulations.However, performance-based compliance continues to depend on complex computational modeling, restricting full automation.Key challenges, including data interoperability issues, difficulties in rule interpretation, and obstacles to industry adoption, emphasizing the need for enhanced regulatory frameworks and stronger BIM-NECB integration.This study highlights BIM's capacity to streamline NECB compliance and support sustainable building practices, reinforcing the role of digital technologies in achieving national energy efficiency objectives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.077
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.178
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0770.178
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0130.016
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0120.008
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBIM and Construction IntegrationFrench-language works237,207