Neal DeRoo, Futurity in Phenomenology : Promise and Method in Husserl, Levinas, and Derrida , New York, Fordham University Press (coll. « Perspectives in Continental Philosophy »), 2013, 212 p., 55 $
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comment Joseph Raphson conçoit-il l’espace, dans son rapport à la détermination newtonienne de l’espace absolu ? La position radicale de Raphson, qui fait de l’espace un attribut stricto sensu de Dieu, ne permet guère d’éclairer les enjeux théologiques de la position de Newton. D’une part, Raphson n’appartenait pas réellement au cercle des newtoniens. D’autre part, et surtout, il pousse à ses limites la notion d’espace absolu en en faisant une entité spirituelle qui est en même temps ce que les corps ont de plus intime. Il s’engage ainsi dans une métaphysique que Newton refuse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".