Real-world effectiveness of tafamidis in a contemporary, matched cohort of patients with variant and wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Tafamidis (meglumine 80 mg/free acid 61 mg) is approved to treat variant or wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). Variant ATTR-CM results from a pathogenic variant in the transthyretin (TTR) gene, whereas wild-type ATTR-CM results from age-related accumulation of wild-type TTR protein. Untreated variant ATTR-CM generally presents with a more aggressive disease progression and with a poorer prognosis than the wild-type form (1,2). In the pivotal phase 3 study ATTR-ACT, tafamidis vs placebo reduced all-cause mortality (ACM) and functional decline in both disease subtypes, but there was a differential benefit observed in cardiovascular-related hospitalisations (CVHs) in the wild-type vs variant cohort (3). Purpose To evaluate mortality and hospitalisations in a real-world cohort of patients with ATTR-CM treated with the approved dose of tafamidis by variant and wild-type genotype. Methods This study pooled a contemporary cohort of patients with ATTR-CM who received early access to tafamidis in the ATTR-ACT long-term extension study but did not participate in the parent study, and a contemporary cohort of patients from the Transthyretin Amyloidosis Outcomes Survey with predominantly cardiac or mixed phenotype ATTR-CM enrolled between 2019–2023 who received tafamidis throughout the study. THAOS was a longitudinal, observational, phase 4 study of patients with transthyretin amyloidosis and asymptomatic gene carriers. Patients with variant ATTR-CM were matched 1:1 to patients with wild-type ATTR-CM based on baseline age, sex, modified body mass index, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, and phenotype (cardiac, mixed). Outcomes were time to event of ACM, first all-cause hospitalisation (ACH), first CVH, and ACM or first CVH. Results A total of 352 patients (176 variant, 176 wild-type) were included. In patients with variant and wild-type ATTR-CM, respectively, median age at enrolment was 72.8 and 73.0 years, and 76.7% and 80.1% were male; 14.2% and 12.5% were in NYHA class I, 51.1% and 50.0% in class II and 34.7% and 37.5% in class III. The estimated adjusted survival probabilities (95% CI) for ACM in patients with variant and wild-type ATTR-CM, respectively, were 66.8% (58.4–76.5) and 70.9% (62.5–80.5) at 30 months and 61.3% (52.1–72.1) and 65.8% (56.2–77.1) at 40 months (Figure). Patients with wild-type ATTR-CM showed slightly better survival rates on 3 of the 4 outcomes: time to ACM, time to first CVH and time to ACM or first CVH (Table). Conclusions This matched-cohort, real-world analysis showed that tafamidis benefited patients with variant and wild-type ATTR-CM in terms of mortality and hospitalisations. However, patients with wild-type ATTR-CM had slightly better outcomes, consistent with previous findings that the variant form has a poorer prognosis and/or poorer therapy response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".