MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Real-world effectiveness of tafamidis in a contemporary, matched cohort of patients with variant and wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy

2025· article· en· W7127988975 on OpenAlexaff
M M Maurer, M Hanna, P Garcia-Pavia, D Delgado, Leslie Amass, Valentina Marino, Martin Carlsson, F Aus Dem Siepen

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransthyretinCohortAmyloidosisAsymptomaticCardiomyopathyCohort studyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Tafamidis (meglumine 80 mg/free acid 61 mg) is approved to treat variant or wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). Variant ATTR-CM results from a pathogenic variant in the transthyretin (TTR) gene, whereas wild-type ATTR-CM results from age-related accumulation of wild-type TTR protein. Untreated variant ATTR-CM generally presents with a more aggressive disease progression and with a poorer prognosis than the wild-type form (1,2). In the pivotal phase 3 study ATTR-ACT, tafamidis vs placebo reduced all-cause mortality (ACM) and functional decline in both disease subtypes, but there was a differential benefit observed in cardiovascular-related hospitalisations (CVHs) in the wild-type vs variant cohort (3). Purpose To evaluate mortality and hospitalisations in a real-world cohort of patients with ATTR-CM treated with the approved dose of tafamidis by variant and wild-type genotype. Methods This study pooled a contemporary cohort of patients with ATTR-CM who received early access to tafamidis in the ATTR-ACT long-term extension study but did not participate in the parent study, and a contemporary cohort of patients from the Transthyretin Amyloidosis Outcomes Survey with predominantly cardiac or mixed phenotype ATTR-CM enrolled between 2019–2023 who received tafamidis throughout the study. THAOS was a longitudinal, observational, phase 4 study of patients with transthyretin amyloidosis and asymptomatic gene carriers. Patients with variant ATTR-CM were matched 1:1 to patients with wild-type ATTR-CM based on baseline age, sex, modified body mass index, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, and phenotype (cardiac, mixed). Outcomes were time to event of ACM, first all-cause hospitalisation (ACH), first CVH, and ACM or first CVH. Results A total of 352 patients (176 variant, 176 wild-type) were included. In patients with variant and wild-type ATTR-CM, respectively, median age at enrolment was 72.8 and 73.0 years, and 76.7% and 80.1% were male; 14.2% and 12.5% were in NYHA class I, 51.1% and 50.0% in class II and 34.7% and 37.5% in class III. The estimated adjusted survival probabilities (95% CI) for ACM in patients with variant and wild-type ATTR-CM, respectively, were 66.8% (58.4–76.5) and 70.9% (62.5–80.5) at 30 months and 61.3% (52.1–72.1) and 65.8% (56.2–77.1) at 40 months (Figure). Patients with wild-type ATTR-CM showed slightly better survival rates on 3 of the 4 outcomes: time to ACM, time to first CVH and time to ACM or first CVH (Table). Conclusions This matched-cohort, real-world analysis showed that tafamidis benefited patients with variant and wild-type ATTR-CM in terms of mortality and hospitalisations. However, patients with wild-type ATTR-CM had slightly better outcomes, consistent with previous findings that the variant form has a poorer prognosis and/or poorer therapy response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, OutcomesFrench-language works237,207