MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128012483 · doi:10.33366/japi.v10i3.7694

Pengembangan Produk Kerajinan Purun Tikus (Eleocharis dulcis) Dalam Upaya Peningkatan Daya Saing

2025· article· W7128012483 on OpenAlexaff
Rizmi Yunita, Abdur Rahman, Deddy Dharmaji, Heri Budi Santoso, Lenie Marlinae

Bibliographic record

VenueJAPI (Jurnal Akses Pengabdian Indonesia) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunity-based Tourism Development and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpanded polystyreneExperimental researchConsumer demand

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kelompok usaha wanita pengrajin purun “Galoeh Bandjar” yang berlokasi di Kelurahan Palam, Kecamatan Cempaka, Kota Banjarbaru, Kalimantan Selatan merupakan kelompok binaan Pemerintah Kota Banjarbaru yang berfokus pada kegiatan kerajinan anyaman purun sekaligus mendukung pengembangan destinasi wisata Kampung Purun. Kegiatan pengabdian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan pelatihan dan pendampingan kepada kelompok mitra dalam upaya penerapan inovasi penambahan gagang kayu pada produk tas berbahan dasar anyaman purun tikus. Metode pelaksanaan meliputi kegiatan pertemuan, penyampaian materi, diskusi interaktif, pelatihan, dan pendampingan langsung kepada pengrajin. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan adanya perubahan positif terhadap sikap dan pengetahuan anggota kelompok mitra, dari yang sebelumnya memiliki pemahaman terbatas menjadi lebih memahami teknik penambahan gagang kayu pada produk tas purun tikus. Pelaksanaan pelatihan dan pendampingan secara teori maupun praktik memberikan pengaruh nyata terhadap peningkatan pemahaman peserta, meskipun peningkatan signifikan baru terjadi pada sebagian anggota kelompok. Kegiatan tersebut secara keseluruhan memberikan dampak positif berupa peningkatan kemampuan, adopsi inovasi, serta perubahan tingkat penilaian kelompok mitra terhadap aspek kreativitas dan kualitas produk dari kategori “cukup” menjadi “baik” dengan kisaran peningkatan 50-60%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAPI (Jurnal Akses Pengabdian Indonesia)Same topicCommunity-based Tourism Development and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207