Time is muscle: uncovering patient behaviour and delays in acute coronary syndrome presentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is the leading cause of death in Canada, with approximately 70,000 new Canadians diagnosed annually. While delays from first medical contact (FMC) to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have improved significantly, the time from symptom onset (SO) to FMC remains largely unchanged, likely due to complex and poorly understood patient behavioural and situational factors. Purpose Our study aims to characterize patients’ presenting symptoms and identify factors contributing to delays in seeking medical care. By recognizing common themes, we seek to develop targeted public awareness initiatives to highlight key symptoms and promote timely healthcare access. Methods In this single-centre prospective study, we surveyed consecutive admitted ACS patients between May to August 2024. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while categorical data were assessed with counts and percentages. The Mann-Whitney Test was applied to continuous variables, and chi-square or Fisher’s Exact test were used for categorical variables. Results Among the 117 participants, 75.2% were male, with a median age of 67±11 years. Of those, 50.4% had ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 41.1% had non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and 8.5% had unstable angina. The median SO-FMC delay was 90 minutes (IQR 20-450 minutes). The primary reasons were misinterpretation of symptoms as non-cardiac (47%), and the belief that symptoms would improve without intervention (38%). The most common ACS symptoms were chest discomfort (88%), diaphoresis (64%), and shortness of breath (54%). Certain symptom characteristics, such as sudden onset (p=0.001), continuous symptoms (p=0.000006), and diaphoresis (p=0.000002), were associated with earlier presentation. Notably, 55% of patients chose to visit the emergency room rather than activate emergency medical services (EMS), though EMS activation was associated with earlier presentation (p=0.000007). Although 83% of patients were aware of heart attack symptoms, only 28% recognized the urgency conveyed by the phrase "time is muscle." Education by healthcare professionals on ACS symptoms and the importance of EMS was associated with earlier care-seeking (p=0.01). Conclusion In summary, we identified factors contributing to delayed ACS presentation which may be used in targeted education to improve outcomes. These results highlight the need for further public health education and interventions to reduce SO-FMC time and improve ACS outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".