Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’ambizioso programma mirato al ripristino della natura forgiato dall’Unione Europea con il Regolamento (UE) 2024/1991 del Parlamento Europeo e del Consiglio del 24 giugno 2024, include nel suo ampio raggio di azione il ripristino degli ecosistemi urbani, in sintonia con più recenti approdi della politica climatico-ambientale internazionale e dell’Unione Europea, e in particolare con il Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework e la EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 Bringing nature back into our lives, ai quali dà formalmente attuazione, che riconoscono al verde urbano non solo la veste di Nature Based Solution idonea a concorrere a limitare le emergenze ambientali dalle quale le città sono indistintamente colpite, in Europea e altrove, ma anche un ruolo strategico nell’ottica del One Health che trascende i confini cittadini. Quali sono gli elementi di sintonia che le indicazioni relative agli ecosistemi urbani contenute nel Regolamento presentano rispetto al quadro politico-normativo vigente in materia, internazionale, unionale e italiano? Quali viceversa le novità che rispetto a questo il Regolamento introduce? Quali sono gli elementi di criticità che sembrano emergere dalla lettura delle nuove disposizioni? La relazione si propone di offrire una prima risposta a queste domande. The ambitious programme for restoring nature, forged by the European Union in Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 of the European Parliament and of the Council on 24 June2024, includes the restoration of urban ecosystems within its broad scope. This is in line with the latest international climate and environmental policies, particularly the Kunming- Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: ‘Bringing Nature Back into Our Lives’. This formally implements the recognition of urban greenery as a nature-based solution that can help limit environmental emergencies affecting cities indiscriminately in Europe and beyond. It also recognises the strategic role of urban greenery beyond city borders in the One Health approach. How do the provisions on urban ecosystems in the Regulation align with the current international, EU and Italian political and regulatory framework? Conversely, what new elements does the Regulation introduce in this regard? What critical issues emerge from an analysis of the new provisions? This report aims to provide initial responses to these questions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".