Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the presented diploma thesis we focus on three basic goals. The first goal is to map the interest of students in the field of Practical Nurse and in the study of nursing at universities and colleges. The second goal is to find out how students of Practical Nurse are interested in entering nursing practice. The third goal is focused on the interest of these students in entering the professions outside the medical fields. The theoretical part of the thesis describes some theories of motivation, education of nurses, the nursing profession, the personality of the nurse, the role of the nurse and the importance of higher education for nurses. The empirical part of the diploma thesis is created through quantitative and qualitative research. Research is focused on the future of Practical nurse students and factors that affect them in choosing universities or colleges. The quantitative research was conducted using a non-standardized anonymous questionnaire. Questionnaires were distributed to students at all secondary medical schools in the South Bohemian Region. A qualitative research survey was mediated through a semi-structured interview. Interviews were conducted with ten students who want to study nursing at a university or college. In the diploma thesis we came to several conclusions. We learned that more than half of our respondents want to continue their studies in nursing at a university or college. On the contrary, less than a quarter of respondents wants to start working. If students want to start working, in most cases they choose a profession as a practical nurse. The remaining part of respondents wants to study other fields at university or college. The main reason that leads respondents to study nursing at university is to increase qualifications and competencies. The work provides an overview and issues of the direction of students in the field of Practical Nurse. The results of the research survey can help universities and colleges to map the future direction of students in the field of Practical Nurse. Also factors that may occur at universities and colleges that influence students in choosing to study nursing at a university or college.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".