Systematics and biology of the southern Western Australian Centrolepidaceae
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Centrolepidaceae are a small Family of 33 species distributed in four genera A phelia, Brizula, Centrolepis and Gaimardia.The genera Hydatella and Trithuria were until recently also considered members of this family, but are now placed in a segregate family, the Hydatellaceae.Members of the two families differ markedly in their biology.Members of the Hydatellaceae are true submerged aquatics (usually ephemeral in life history), whereas the Centrolepidaceae are wetland or terrestrial plants.Dioecy and unisexual inflorescences are common in the Hydatellaceae and not in Centrolepidaceae.Seed dispersal is often by seeds being held on the plant by Cenrolepidaceae but liberated by Hydatellaceae.Apomixis and obligate outbreeding occurs in Hydatellaceae, modal outbreeding, inbreeding/self fertility are found in the Centrolepidaceae.Many of the distinguishing characters between the families are related to these differences in basic biology.Recently the genera A phelia and Brizula have again been merged but inflorescence structure strongly suggests that these genera should remain separate.In terms of its members' biology and morphology the family has little in common with the Jointed Sedges (Restionaceae).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".