MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Училищният директор като ефективен лидер в началното училище в областта Пафос, Кипър

2025· article· W7128441346 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Христия Тукидиду

Bibliographic record

VenueГодишник на Софийския университет "Св Климент Охридски" Факултет по педагогика Книга Педагогика · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTeacher Education and Leadership Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCentralityAdministration (probate law)Educational administrationWork (physics)PoliticsPrincipal (computer security)Field (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

В студията са представени и анализирани резултати от емпирично изследване на ефективното лидерство в училище. Проучено е мнението на директори и учители от областта Пафос в Кипър относно пет характеристи на ефективния училищен директор, дискутирани в научната литература: визия, комуникация и споделени цели, овластяване, ръководство и управление на персонала, включване на родителите. На базата на получените емпирични данни са формулирани някои препоръки за подобрения, отнасящи се до професионалната подтотовка, продължаващото обучение и професионалното развитие на директорите в Кипър. Библиография: Andrews, R. L. and Hallet, J. (1983) The Role of the Principal in Washington State, Final Report, Seattle: University of Washington. Bennis, W. (1986) Leaders: The strategies for Taking charge by Warren. Bossert, S. T, Dwyer, D. C., Rowan, B. and Less, G. V (1982) the instractional management role of principal. - Educational Administration Quarterly, 18 (3), pp. 34-64. Delamont, S. (1993) Field Work in Educational Setting. London, The Falmer Press. Edmonds, R. (1979) Effective Schools for the urban poor. - Educational Leadership, 37, pp. 15-24. Fuller, B. & Clarke, P. (1994) Raising school effects while ignoring culture? Local conditions and the influence of classroom tools, rales and pedagogy. - Review of Educational Research, 64 (119-15). Greenfield, D. W. (1995) Toward a Theory of School Administration. The Centrality of Leadership. - Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(1), pp. 61-85. Ifanti, A. A. (1995) Policy Making, Politics and Administration in Education in Greece. - Educational Management and Administration, 23(4), pp. 271-277. Lewis, C. A. (1995) Higher standards. - Education Digest, 61 (Oct), pp. 69-71. Leithwood, K. and Montgomery, D. J. (1986) Improving principal effectiveness. The principal profile, Ontario, OISE Press. Lockheed, M. E . (1996) Educational efficiency in developing countries. - In: Pennycuick, David (1998) Centre for international Education. University of Sussex, ONLINE: http://sleekfreak.atc.cx:81/3wder/HDLHTML/EDUCRES/DEPOl/BEGIN.HTM Lucas, S., Brown, G. C., & Markus, F. W. (1991) Principal’s perceptions of site based management and teacher empowerment. NASSIP Bulletin, 75 (3570, 56-62). Mortimore, P, Sammons, P, Stoll, L., Lewis, D. and Ecob R. (1988) School Matters: the junior years. Wells: Open Books. ODA (1994) Japan's Annual Report (Summary). Pennycuick, D. (1994) School effectiveness in Developing Countries: A summary of the Research Evidence. London: Overseas Development Agency. Sallis, E. (1996) Total quality management in education. 2nd edition, London: Kogan Page. Somerset. Wildy, H. and Dimmock, C. (1993) Instructional Leadership in Primary and Secondary Schools in Western. - Australia Journal of Educational Administration, 31(2), pp. 43-62. Wing, D. J. (1987) The examination of staff Perceptions of the importance of characteristics Associated with strong Instructional Leadership at the Elementary, Middle and High School Levels. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueГодишник на Софийския университет "Св Климент Охридски" Факултет по педагогика Книга ПедагогикаSame topicTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesFrench-language works237,207