MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128489997 · doi:10.64903/1480-6800.20.1.66

Assessing Spatiotemporal Variability of Drought in Tihama Plain, Yemen, Using the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) with GIS

2017· article· W7128489997 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ali Ahmed Ali Dhaif Allah, Noorazuan Hashim, Azahan Bin Awang

Bibliographic record

VenueArab world geographer · 2017
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgriculturePrecipitationAgricultural productivityLivelihoodSpatial distributionIndex (typography)Spatial variabilityFood security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drought remains the most frequent and serious environmental threat in the Middle East region. In Yemen, drought has negatively affected both livelihood and sustainable development. This study aims to assess spatiotemporal variability of drought severity in the Tihama Plain—one of Yemen's most important agricultural areas, which contributes about 42 % of the country's total agricultural production. In recent years, the Tihama Plain has seen changes in the rainy season that have had a negative impact on agriculture production and water security in the area. This study uses the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) to conduct a temporal evaluation of the drought situation, as well as using geographic information systems (GIS) to show the spatial distribution of drought in the study area. The SPI-6 analysis results show that the years 1984, 1991, 2002–6, and 2008 were the most affected by drought during the 30-year study period (1980–2010), and show that 1991 was the worst drought year experienced by the study area during this period. Because the study area is the most important agricultural area in Yemen, a study of the drought and its impacts on agricultural crops in this region is recommended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArab world geographerSame topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207