MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128495246 · doi:10.64903/1480-6800-26.3-4.301

Weather Parameter Trends and Variability of the Water Balance in Constantine State, Algeria

2023· article· W7128495246 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amel Guerroudj

Bibliographic record

VenueArab world geographer · 2023
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWater balanceLinear regressionTrend analysisRegression analysisBalance (ability)Water supplyDistribution (mathematics)Production (economics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article aims at investigating the weather parameter trends impact on the production of drinking water and water balance in the state of Constantine, Algeria. In this respect, statistical criteria (the Mann-Kendall trend test, linear regression model and deviations from the average) were used to show the close relationship between the general trend and the variability of the annual mean temperature and rainfall during the period from 1976 to 2020, as well as the variability in the waterbalance to determine the water gap for the period 2007-2019. The results from the Mann-Kendall test shows that the annual trends of the minimum, maximum and normal temperature are increasing after showing positive Mann-Kendall Z-values (0,41; 5,29 and 3,74) respectively. However, the annual rainfall trend was observed to be decreasing after having a negative Z-value (-1,36). Therefore, the estimation parameters of linear regression correlate with the study results. However, an examination of the12- year (2007-2019) water balance revealed it is evident that water production is not significantly affected by the general trends of temperature and rainfall. Additionally, the distribution of drinking water reveals an inequality, and real needs of drinking water in this state are not under control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArab world geographerSame topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207