MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128514244 · doi:10.64903/1480-6800-26.3-4.346

Reading the Political Culture of Arab League States through Maps on Postage Stamps

2023· article· W7128514244 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Stanley D. Brunn

Bibliographic record

VenueArab world geographer · 2023
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNational Identity and Symbolism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeaguePostage StampsContext (archaeology)PoliticsTanzaniaExposition (narrative)DiplomacyReading (process)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Visualizing political culture is a major objective of states. These efforts include, for example, organizing holiday events, constructing monuments and issuing postage stamps. Stamps are visual products that are designed to inform the observer about the state’s place in a regional and global context historically and today. Maps play an important role in these visual efforts. We examine the map stamps issued by the 22 Arab League members, looking at total numbers, topics and themes. Almost 1 100 map stamps have been issued, most since 1960. The leaders in numbers issued range from 75+ each for Iraq, Egypt, Djibouti, Libya and Syria to <30 each for Kuwait, Sudan, UAE, Somalia, Lebanon and Yemen. Map themes also vary by country. Some mostly issued stamps with national themes; others were more international (Mauritania, Morocco, Tanzania and Tunisia). Some issued stamps with maps of Palestine (Algeria, Iraq, Libya, Palestine, Saudi Arabia and Syria), the Deir Yassin massacre (Egypt, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia), regional themes such as explorers (Djibouti), popes (Tunisia), COVID-19 (Oman), a Japanese exposition (Comoros Islands), and the U.S. bicentennial (Morocco). Subsequent research could focus on the designers and producers of stamps, or changes in topics or regions over the past 40 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArab world geographerSame topicNational Identity and SymbolismFrench-language works237,207