MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128517655 · doi:10.64903/1480-6800.22.4.333

Dried Products and Sustainable Development in Saharan Regions: The Case of Ghardaïa in the M’zab Region of Algeria

2019· article· W7128517655 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hocine Bensaha, Abdelouahab Benseddik, Djemoui Lalmi, Rachid Zegait, R. Arbouche

Bibliographic record

VenueArab world geographer · 2019
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWater management and technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureSustainable developmentProduction (economics)Scale (ratio)Agricultural productivityAgricultural machineryLocal Development

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the M’zab in Algeria, the Saharan region of Ghardaïa has an immense solar energy potential that if properly utilized could significantly contribute to sustainable development and provide concrete solutions to socio-economic problems that arise with acuity in these desert regions. This region is endowed with a dynamic of development, able to favor the emergence of systems diversity, and agricultural and agrofood products of high quality. In recent years, the drying of fruits and vegetables on a small scale has witnessed renewed interest in the M’zab. The drying of agricultural products represents a very important socio-economic activity and serves as a main vector for the dynamics of local development. This study conducted an analysis to better identify the obstacles that hinder this practice. However, the valorization, resources and local products through the local assets were found to be beset by certain problems. The inventory of activities of fruit and vegetable in southern Algeria has shown that despite the different products available locally, the need for drying devices that better meet users’ expectations remains very important. It is therefore very appropriate to develop drying facilities that can support local agricultural production and ensure its preservation during peak production. Reflection on the positioning of this practice has proved to be an important step that will reduce the costs of setting up new units.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArab world geographerSame topicWater management and technologiesFrench-language works237,207