MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128526979 · doi:10.37665/smmgrnc93268

The Effect of Dwell Time on Thermal Cycling Performance of High Reliability Solder Alloys with a −55/125 °C Test Condition

2025· article· W7128526979 on OpenAlex
Richard Coyle, Dave Hillman, Michael Osterman, Tim Pearson, Chloe Feng, Isaac Becker, Richard Popowich, Joe Smetana, Keith Howell, Jayse McLean, Julie Silk, H. Zhang, Jie Geng, Derek Daily, Anna Lifton, Ranjit Pandher, Jean-Christophe Riou, K. Sweatman, Madan Jagernauth, Grace O'Malley, Dennis Fritz, Shantanu Joshi, Jasbir Bath

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSMTA International · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicElectronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemperature cyclingReliability (semiconductor)Ball grid arrayDwell timeSolderingIndium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The past decade has seen the development of commercial, third-generation, high reliability Pb-free solder alloys designed to meet the requirements of higher temperature use environments. Most of these offerings are based on the Sn-Ag-Cu (SAC) system, with major alloying additions of bismuth (Bi), antimony (Sb), or indium (In). These elements, individually or in combination, promote additional precipitation, solid solution, or dispersion strengthening that can resist microstructural degradation at elevated temperatures or during aggressive thermal cycling. Results from the literature show that an increase in thermal cycling dwell time can decrease the thermal cycling reliability of SAC solders. Because these high reliability solder alloys are designed for extended operation at higher temperatures, it is important to understand their behavior and characterize their reliability at extended thermal cycling dwell times. This paper presents the initial results from an experimental program designed to compare thermal cycling results for high reliability solder alloys using a typical dwell time of 10 minutes to an extended dwell of 60 minutes. The 10-minute data were generated in the initial phase of testing and preliminary results were published previously. The current data are based on a thermal cycling test condition of −55/125 °C (TC7 in IPC-9701B) and the test vehicles are a 192-pin chip array ball grid array (192CABGA) and an 84-pin thin core ball grid array (84CTBGA). The high reliability alloys were found to outperform the prevalent SAC305 (Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu) consistently. With the 192CABGA, SAC305 showed a moderate loss of reliability with increased dwell time, but some high reliability alloys had comparable performance with 60-minute and 10-minute dwell times, and others performed much better with the 60-minute dwell. With the 84CTBGA, the high reliability alloys have comparable performance with 60-minute and 10-minute dwell times, with only one alloy performing slightly better with the 60-minute dwell. The surprising finding was that SAC305, when tested with the 84CTBGA, exhibits no dwell time effect with the −55/125 °C test condition. All the alloys exhibited thermal fatigue failures in the bulk solder, but most of the high reliability alloys also exhibited interfacial or mixed mode failures, which complicates interpretation of the data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.594
Threshold uncertainty score0.741

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it