MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

МУЛЬТИКУЛЬТУРАЛІЗМ ЯК ЧИННИК ДЕМОКРАТИЧНОГО РОЗВИТКУ СУСПІЛЬСТВА ТА РОЗБУДОВИ КІБЕРПРОСТОРУ У КОНТЕКСТІ СУЧАСНОЇ ЕТНОПОЛІТИКИ

2025· article· W7128619043 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ірина КРИНИЧНА

Bibliographic record

VenueНаукові праці Міжрегіональної Академії управління персоналом Політичні науки та публічне управління · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Media and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticulturalismCyberspacePoliticsContext (archaeology)State (computer science)DemocracyIdentity (music)Diversity (politics)Ethnic group

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article examines the phenomenon of multiculturalism as one of the key factors in the democratic development of modern society. It analyses conceptual approaches to multiculturalism in the context of Western philosophical and political thought and traces the transformation of ideas of multiculturalism in the political practices of different countries. The influence of cultural diversity on the legitimisation of democratic institutions, the formation of civic identity and the development of inclusive policies is substantiated. The article draws on the experience of countries such as the United States, Canada, Great Britain, the Netherlands and Sweden, where multiculturalism is or has been an element of state policy. The article emphasises that the current state of ethnic policy requires a fundamental review aimed at rethinking traditional approaches and forming new priorities. This process is impossible without a thorough analysis of existing and well-established theories of multiculturalism, which remain the basic conceptual foundation. At the same time, modern realities necessitate the development of new models of co-regulation that not only build on previous theoretical achievements but also adequately respond to the challenges of cyberspace. The latter is characterised by phenomena such as hybridity, nomadism, temporality, anonymity, and in some cases, desubjectivised cyberpsychosis, which gives rise to qualitatively new risks and mechanisms of social interaction. It is noted that the cyber revolution is a process of comprehensive automation of technological practices, within which the desubjectification of the individual and the narrowing of their opportunities for self-determination take place. Under such conditions, cyberspace appears not as a new arena for regulating ethnopolitical relations, but rather as an accelerator of their disintegration. Instead of performing an integrated function, digital technologies contribute to the fragmentation of public space, perpetuating multiple and isolated, and sometimes radicalised microcommunities, which, in turn, are characterised by the rejection of universal normative systems, the delegitimisation of state institutions and the formation of alternative, often post-national identities that complicate the processes of political consolidation and social integration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueНаукові праці Міжрегіональної Академії управління персоналом Політичні науки та публічне управління→Same topicSocial Media and Politics→French-language works237,207→