Evaluarea formelor parentale ale hibrizilor competitivi de porumb
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper presents the results of field experiments of 104 inbred lines of maize created within the Institute of Phytotechny “Porumbeni” and promoted as parental forms of competitive hybrids with the pedigree originating from the germplasm sources Reid - Iodent, Lancaster, Euroflint, Dent Canadian and BSSS-B37. The obtained results proved the high grain yield of inbred lines with pedigree originating from the germplasm Reid-Iodent and low moisture content in the newly harvested grains of inbred lines originating from the germplasm BSSS-B37. The evaluation of parental forms in terms of precocity revealed newlines which have a shorter period up to flowering. As a result, it was obtained a diversification of germplasm sourcesfor improving early hybrids and middle season hybrids. Rezumat. În articol sunt prezentate rezultatele testării în câmp a 104 linii consangvinizate, forme parentale ale hibrizilor competitivi de porumb, cu pedigreul din sursele de germoplasmă Reid-Iodent, Lancaster, Euroflint, Dent Canadian şi BSSS-B37. Rezultatele au demonstrat productivitatea înaltă a liniilor cu pedigreul din sursa de germoplasmă Reid-Iodent şi conţinutul scăzut de umiditate în boabele proaspăt recoltate la liniile cu originea din BSSS-B37. În afară de aceasta, evaluarea liniilor la precocitate a permis evidenţierea în grupele de germoplasmă a liniilor noi cu o perioadă de până la înflorire mai scurtă. Prin aceasta, amelioratorii au reuşit diversificarea surselor de germoplasmă în ameliorarea hibrizilor timpurii şi de precocitate medie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".