A Window onto the Medieval World: the consumption of English window glass at high status monastic sites in England, 12th to 16th century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to examine the consumption of English window glass at high status sites, using a case study of excavated window glass dated from the 12th to 16th centuries from selected Benedictine and Cistercian abbeys across England. Glassmaking in England appears to have only started in the 13th century and at this point was a nascent industry, in competition with window glass procured from the continent. Seven monastic sites were selected across complementary sites spanning the length of England, and 284 samples of excavated window glass were examined, using stylistic, technological, art historical and chemical techniques. The thesis shows all the window glasses in the study were sourced from France, Germany and England. French window glass dominated all monastic establishments until the mid-14th century, after which time German glass dominates. English window glass appears to have been used in the first half of the 14th century and onwards; however, evidence for its use is scarce, and those abbeys in closer proximity to the major glassmaking areas in the Weald and Staffordshire appear to have been the early adopters. Moreover, abbeys in the east favoured German and some English glass, while those in the west bought their glass from France. English producers limited their market appeal because of their failure to produce coloured glass (whether through choice or a lack of knowledge), while the continental producers could supply both coloured and uncoloured. This resulted in a more restricted range of decorative elements applied to the English glasses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".