Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alberta Energy Regulator, Aker ASA, Aker BP, American Petroleum Institute, Aqualis Offshore, Australian Research Data Commons, Chevron, Center for Sustainable Energy, New Zealand, EITI, Element Materials Technology, Equinor, Forum Energy Technologies, Flotek Industries, Flowserve, Fiber Optic Sensing Association, FTS International, Halliburton, Hastings Equity Partners, Refractory Construction Services, Beacon Offshore Energy, HWCG, Deepwater Subsea Well Containment Consortium, IDC Energy Insights, IntOp, International Society of Automation, Katalyst, Marathon Oil, Nine Energy Service, Open Geospatial Consortium, Olyslager, PIDX, PRCI, ProStar Geocorp, Quorum Software, Preem, Radiflow, Texas Railroad Commission, Schlumberger, Seeq, Shell, SNC-Lavalin, Software AG, VAKT, Altair, Total, Anadarko, Teradata, Wintershall, Inpex, Yokogawa, University of Oxford, Lyell Centre, British Geological Survey, Heriot-Watt University, OFS Portal, Petrosys, PGS, Digital Plant Engineering, USPI, CFIHOS, Journal of Structural Geology, eLynx Technologies, ExproSoft, IFS, OPC Foundation, OGC, Sewall, Rockwell Automation, Mercell Holding, View Software, Petrobras, Coreworx, Carnegie Mellon, CDA. Deaths.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.549 | 0.492 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".