MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7130315101 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18678633

Protocol for the 2025 revised Utstein-Style Recommended Guidelines for Uniform Reporting of Data From Drowning Resuscitation

2025· article· en· W7130315101 on OpenAlexaff
Niklas Breindahl, Joost Bierens, Gavin Perkins, Janet Bray, Freddy Lippert, Tracy McCallin, Ahamed Idris, R. Barcala-Furelos, Yohei Okada, Feng Xu, Taku Iwami, Therese Djärv, Anthony T. Lagina, Cody Dunne, David Szpilman, Andreas Claesson, Ogilvie Thom, Jonathon Webber, Colleen Saunders, Matthew Fader, Jasmin Lawes, Baljit Singh, Tom Mecrow

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInjury Epidemiology and Prevention
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtocol (science)ResuscitationCardiopulmonary resuscitationMEDLINEData collection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.126
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.298
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score0.668

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1260.298
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.012
Bibliometrics0.0090.008
Science and technology studies0.0080.005
Scholarly communication0.0130.005
Open science0.0070.006
Research integrity0.0200.022
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1290.091

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.375
GPT teacher head0.472
Teacher spread0.096 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicInjury Epidemiology and PreventionFrench-language works237,207