MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Triple Laplace Transform Driven System for Solving Linear Partial Differential Equations

2025· article· W7130353250 on OpenAlexaff
Ranjana Gothankar, Bhawna Agrawal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsFuture Earth
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaplace transformPartial differential equationFinite element methodConvergence (economics)Operator (biology)Artificial neural networkBenchmark (surveying)Parametric statisticsFourier transformBoundary value problem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research can be introduced as a new and innovative computational way for solve the composed system of linear partial differential equations using triple Laplace transformation augmented with Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN's). We design hybrid symbolic-numeric architecture which is based on SymPy and PyTorch, automatic differentiation system for the implementation of the computation of the residuals in transformed domains. The methodology uses DeepXDE framework to approximate solution manifolds together with boundary condition being enforced by soft constraints weighted using adaptive loss balancing algorithms. Neural operator networks as Fourier Neural Operators (FNO) have blooming poise stamping processes of multi-dimensional convolutions moving from triple transform inversion. We make TensorBoard visualization of the monitoring of the convergence for 10000 of training iterations resulting in the lower than <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$10^{\wedge}-6$</tex> mean squared errors for benchmark problems as well as 3-dimensional heat equations and coupled wave diffusion systems. Comparative analysis against traditional based finite element method shows the speedup of 40x in Parametric studies. Integration with JAX allows it the framework hardware-acceleration on TPUs that makes it possible to generate real-time solutions for industrial scenarios that require a quick scenario analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicModel Reduction and Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207