MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

High-Density Photonic Convolution Computing Enabled by a Soliton Microcomb and a Microdisk Mesh Array

2025· article· W7130591212 on OpenAlexaff
Shanshan Cheng, Yiran Guan, Chenye Qin, Kunpeng Jia, Zhenda Xie, Jianping Yao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotonicsConvolution (computer science)Kernel (algebra)Convolutional neural networkSolitonOptical computingSilicon photonicsParallel processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) accelerated by photonic computing have attracted significant attention due to its potential to overcome the speed, scalability, and energy limitations of electronic architectures. An optical frequency comb has been demonstrated as a promising light source for dense photonic computing, thanks to its ability to provide multiple evenly spaced and mutually coherent frequency channels. However, prior microcomb-based convolution kernel accelerators have faced challenges, including limited computing density and insufficient dynamic reconfigurability. In this paper, we demonstrate a photonic convolutional processor achieving a computing density of 48 TOPS/mm² by combining a packaged soliton microcomb as the light source with a chip-scale micro disk mesh structure as the computing core. The soliton source exhibits excellent frequency and intensity stability, with a relative standard deviation of 0.48% over 60 minutes. The micro-disk mesh structure aligns both physically and topologically with 2D convolution operations, enabling reconfigurable and signed convolutional computing. This photonic convolutional processor offers strong potential for integration into high-speed, low-power consumption edge AI platforms and lays the foundation for scalable, reconfigurable on-chip optical neural networks in future large-scale photonic computing systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeural Networks and Reservoir ComputingFrench-language works237,207