MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Interpretable Sparse Fourier-Based Convolutional Neural Network (SpFFT-CNN) for Eccentricity Faults Classification

2025· article· W7130686252 on OpenAlexaff
Latifa Yusuf, Belaid Moa, T. Ilamparithi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscriminative modelHarmonicsPreprocessorPattern recognition (psychology)Convolutional neural networkHarmonicFault (geology)Artificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an interpretable frequency-domain approach for fault classification in synchronous machines using a Sparse Fourier-based Convolutional Neural Network (SpFFT-CNN). The method extends a time-domain convolutional neural network by integrating learnable spectral weights that operate directly in the frequency domain. These weights adaptively emphasize the harmonic components that contribute most to class separation, allowing the network to identify discriminative frequency regions for different fault conditions. The model was applied to current signals containing healthy and eccentric faults under three preprocessing configurations: with DC (direct current) component, without DC, and without mean. The harmonic spectra learned in each case reveal consistent frequency patterns that remain stable across all the model variants, confirming that the network captures genuine spectral characteristics. The higher harmonics consistently define mixed eccentricity, the lower harmonics dominate dynamic eccentricity, and static eccentricity maintains an overlap that is more pronounced when DC is retained. The results demonstrate that the SpFFT-CNN not only achieves a perfect fault classification but also provides a transparent interpretation of the underlying frequency structure. This framework bridges signal-based analysis and deep learning by linking classification accuracy directly to harmonic interpretability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207