MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7130725465 · doi:10.1109/swc65939.2025.00037

Secure Fog-Edge and 5G-Enabled Architecture for AI-Driven Mobility, Real-Time Traffic Analytics, and Accessibility in Aging-Focused Intelligent Transportation Systems

2025· article· W7130725465 on OpenAlexaff
Victor Balogun, Sayed Saminur Rahman, William Kai Watt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntelligent transportation systemArchitecturePopulationWearable computerAnalyticsSystems architectureInterface (matter)Advanced driver assistance systemsArchitecture framework

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the global population aged 65 and older expected to double by 2050, ensuring equitable access to safe, efficient, and responsive transportation systems has become a pressing societal imperative. This paper introduces a secure fog-edge and 5G-enabled architecture designed to enhance the safety and accessibility of aging populations within next-generation Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). The proposed framework integrates AI-powered elderly vehicle monitoring for proactive risk detection, real-time traffic analytics through decentralized edge-fog computing, and adaptive intelligent traffic lights that respond dynamically to the mobility needs of older drivers and pedestrians.Leveraging decentralized edge intelligence, blockchain-enhanced privacy safeguards, wearable health-monitoring integration, and AI-driven analytics, the system provides ultra-low-latency, resilient, and adaptive mobility services. The architecture emphasizes latency mitigation, human-centered interface design, dynamic risk evaluation, and policy-aligned cybersecurity strategies. Analytical comparisons demonstrate that local data processing combined with predictive threat modeling can substantially reduce transportation-related health risks, improve decision-making efficiency, and foster inclusive urban mobility. A novel architectural model is presented to inform the design of secure, accessible, and aging-centric ITS infrastructures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)French-language works237,207