MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7130989255 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18733455

The Application and Assessment of 5G Technology in Facilitating Digital Transformation within Benin's Urban Landscape

2001· article· en· W7130989255 on OpenAlexaff
Koffi Makonde, Seyni Sanon, Timothée Tinée

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Cities and Technologies
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)StakeholderGovernment (linguistics)Digital transformationPopulationKey (lock)Data collectionPrivate sectorUrban planning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The urban landscape of Benin is undergoing significant changes driven by rapid population growth and economic development. The need for robust communication infrastructure to support these transformations has become increasingly evident, particularly in the context of emerging digital technologies such as 5G. A mixed-method approach was employed, combining quantitative data collection through surveys and interviews with qualitative analysis of existing infrastructure and stakeholder perspectives. Statistical models were used to analyse data on network performance and user adoption rates. The preliminary findings indicate that while 5G coverage is expanding in urban centers, there are still significant gaps, particularly in less populated areas. A key theme emerging from the qualitative analysis involves the need for government support to bridge these digital divides. This study highlights the importance of a collaborative approach involving both private and public sectors to maximise the benefits of 5G technology in Benin's urban environment. Recommendations include developing comprehensive strategies for infrastructure deployment, fostering partnerships between tech companies and local governments, and conducting further research on specific use cases that could benefit from 5G. Benin, 5G Technology, Digital Transformation, Urban Development, Mixed-Methods Research Model estimation used $\hat{\theta}=argmin_{\theta}\sum_i\ell(y_i,f_\theta(x_i))+\lambda\lVert\theta\rVert_2^2$, with performance evaluated using out-of-sample error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSmart Cities and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207