MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131084870 · doi:10.1109/iccvw69036.2025.00503

HiSS: Human-Inspired Semantic Segmentation for Vehicle Interior Scene Understanding

2025· article· W7131084870 on OpenAlexaff
Joanna Jaworek-Korjakowska

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSegmentationIntersection (aeronautics)Process (computing)Focus (optics)Component (thermodynamics)Image segmentationKey (lock)PixelSemantics (computer science)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Computer vision plays a critical role in autonomous vehicle technology, with semantic segmentation being a key component by labeling each pixel in an image. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a bio-inspired hybrid approach that combines binary and multiclass segmentation process to improve semantic segmentation in vehicle interiors as part of a Cabin Monitoring System, drawing inspiration from human visual perception processes. Experiments were conducted on synthetic data from the SVIRO dataset using SegFormer, a transformer-based model for segmentation, and YOLO for detection, respectively. Various architectures with a novel hybrid approach were tested that mimics the hierarchical processing of the human attention mechanism by using different Gaussian and distance transform-based masks to refine the focus of the multiclass model. The innovative hybrid approach combining binary and multiclass segmentation improved the mean Intersection over Union from 0.55 to 0.61. Two perceptually-motivated postprocessing methods were developed: a basic approach inspired by visual completion phenomena that further enhanced mIoU to 0.76, and an extended context-aware variant that achieved better accuracy (0.87 vs. 0.84) by analyzing neighborhood information to determine appropriate replacement classes, simi-lar to human contextual integration processes. These methods are highly generic and can be adapted to a wide range of segmentation challenges beyond vehicle interiors. The integration of human perceptual principles into computational vision systems demonstrates the value of biomimetic approaches in advancing artificial intelligence. In addition, we provide a detailed discussion of the results and outline potential directions for future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyFrench-language works237,207